Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Abortion
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
88
 questions about 
Physics
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
117
 questions about 
Children
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
81
 questions about 
Identity
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
374
 questions about 
Logic
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Perception
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
110
 questions about 
Animals
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
67
 questions about 
Feminism
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Culture
24
 questions about 
Suicide
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law

Question of the Day

Let's stick with criminal law here. One obvious reason why "immoral" doesn't entail "illegal" is that what's legal, what's not, and what the punishments are needs to be clear. In a functioning legal system, it's generally possible to determine in advance whether something is a crime, and in cases where it's not clear, there's a system for settling the matter, with various safeguards and forms of appeal built in. But there are plenty of moral loose ends — matters on which people disagree, sometimes vehemently, about whether something is immoral.

We might try restricting things by saying that actions which are clearly immoral should be illegal. Unfortunately, however, that doesn't move the ball as far as it would need to go. When people disagree vehemently about moral matters, one side typically thinks something is clearly immoral and the other side that it clearly isn't. Few of us would want to live in a state where we might be subject to imprisonment because some judge judges that something we think is moral is actually immoral. I may think that a statutory law is a bad one, but I can at least know in advance what the law actually is and work to get it changed if I want to.

In addition to these more general reasons, there's sheer practicality. Legal systems aren't meant to address all problems or govern all behavior, and thank Heavens for that. For one thing, the resources it would take to enforce all of morality through the law would be extraordinary, and better spent in other ways. But also, most people — I'm one — think that there should be a sphere of life that's outside the reach of the State. If morality is entirely swallowed up by the law, that sphere will shrink to almost nothing. And again: I suspect that very few of us would want to live in a country like that.