Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

151
 questions about 
Existence
31
 questions about 
Space
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
117
 questions about 
Children
77
 questions about 
Emotion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
374
 questions about 
Logic
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
89
 questions about 
Law
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
105
 questions about 
Art
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
27
 questions about 
Gender
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
51
 questions about 
War
208
 questions about 
Science
36
 questions about 
Literature
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Perception
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.