Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

124
 questions about 
Profession
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
31
 questions about 
Space
134
 questions about 
Love
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
69
 questions about 
Business
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Culture
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
89
 questions about 
Law
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
88
 questions about 
Physics
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Perception
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Animals
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Punishment
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Biology
39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Beauty
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
24
 questions about 
Suicide
374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War
96
 questions about 
Time
154
 questions about 
Sex
34
 questions about 
Music
70
 questions about 
Truth
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children

Question of the Day

My understanding is that Buddhism teaches the doctrine of anatta — "no self." This doesn't mean that there aren't people in the ordinary sense. It means that there is no underyling metaphysical substance that amounts to the self. But I'm not aware of anything in Buddhism that would fairly be described as solipsism. So "the internet" got this one wrong (except for the thousands of places where it gets it right.

as for thoughts, feelings, emotions, etc., people do think, they do feel, they do have emotions. Or better, perhaps, there are thoughts, there are feelings, there are emotions. But they aren't tied together by some underyling soul or mental substance. The Scottish philosopher David Hume held a similar view. On Hume's view, a person is a "bundle of perceptions," though that's a bit too crude to get it right. In recent philosophical history, Derek Parfit developed a view that he would be the first to admit owes a great deal to Hume and to Buddhism.

As for minds and consciousnesses, it depends on what you mean. If by a "consciousness" you mean some sort of entity above and beyond the brain/body complex, I take the Buddhist view to be that there isn't such a thing. But if you want a more informed and detailed answer, you might take a look at this from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mind-indian-buddhism/