Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics
124
 questions about 
Profession
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
96
 questions about 
Time
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
105
 questions about 
Art
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
374
 questions about 
Logic
31
 questions about 
Space
117
 questions about 
Children
51
 questions about 
War
134
 questions about 
Love
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
287
 questions about 
Language
284
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
69
 questions about 
Business
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.