Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Animals
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Abortion
88
 questions about 
Physics
43
 questions about 
Color
24
 questions about 
Suicide
117
 questions about 
Children
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Beauty
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
221
 questions about 
Value
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Action
68
 questions about 
Happiness
374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.