Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
221
 questions about 
Value
88
 questions about 
Physics
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
36
 questions about 
Literature
34
 questions about 
Music
51
 questions about 
War
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
208
 questions about 
Science
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Action
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
54
 questions about 
Medicine
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space
80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.