Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

81
 questions about 
Identity
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
80
 questions about 
Death
31
 questions about 
Space
39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
392
 questions about 
Religion
124
 questions about 
Profession
221
 questions about 
Value
244
 questions about 
Justice
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
154
 questions about 
Sex
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Animals
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.