Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Abortion
244
 questions about 
Justice
77
 questions about 
Emotion
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Animals
27
 questions about 
Gender
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
80
 questions about 
Death
374
 questions about 
Logic
89
 questions about 
Law
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Beauty
24
 questions about 
Suicide
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
117
 questions about 
Children
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.