Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
4
 questions about 
Economics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
89
 questions about 
Law
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
68
 questions about 
Happiness
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.