Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
23
 questions about 
History
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Beauty
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
117
 questions about 
Children
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
68
 questions about 
Happiness
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.