Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Biology
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Action
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
27
 questions about 
Gender
77
 questions about 
Emotion
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
374
 questions about 
Logic
244
 questions about 
Justice
284
 questions about 
Mind
81
 questions about 
Identity
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
31
 questions about 
Space
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Abortion
105
 questions about 
Art
208
 questions about 
Science
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.