Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

124
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
374
 questions about 
Logic
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
54
 questions about 
Medicine
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
244
 questions about 
Justice
154
 questions about 
Sex
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
151
 questions about 
Existence
77
 questions about 
Emotion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Culture
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
51
 questions about 
War
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.