Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
244
 questions about 
Justice
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Beauty
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
81
 questions about 
Identity
68
 questions about 
Happiness
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Culture
105
 questions about 
Art
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
88
 questions about 
Physics

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.