Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
170
 questions about 
Freedom
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History
69
 questions about 
Business
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
81
 questions about 
Identity
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
284
 questions about 
Mind
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
67
 questions about 
Feminism
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
134
 questions about 
Love
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.