Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
24
 questions about 
Suicide
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
284
 questions about 
Mind
81
 questions about 
Identity
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
69
 questions about 
Business
36
 questions about 
Literature
287
 questions about 
Language
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Abortion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
374
 questions about 
Logic
117
 questions about 
Children
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Beauty
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Perception
170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.