Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Perception
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
284
 questions about 
Mind
80
 questions about 
Death
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
89
 questions about 
Law
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence
218
 questions about 
Education

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.