Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
39
 questions about 
Race
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
170
 questions about 
Freedom
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Perception
117
 questions about 
Children
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
105
 questions about 
Art
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.