Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Biology
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
134
 questions about 
Love
89
 questions about 
Law
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
287
 questions about 
Language
284
 questions about 
Mind
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
43
 questions about 
Color
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
88
 questions about 
Physics
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Punishment

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.