Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
105
 questions about 
Art
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
392
 questions about 
Religion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Punishment
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
134
 questions about 
Love
68
 questions about 
Happiness
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Perception
4
 questions about 
Economics
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
77
 questions about 
Emotion
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
117
 questions about 
Children
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.