Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
134
 questions about 
Love
34
 questions about 
Music
68
 questions about 
Happiness
36
 questions about 
Literature
208
 questions about 
Science
284
 questions about 
Mind
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
218
 questions about 
Education
39
 questions about 
Race
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
151
 questions about 
Existence
31
 questions about 
Space
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
89
 questions about 
Law
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.