Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
89
 questions about 
Law
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
117
 questions about 
Children
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
81
 questions about 
Identity
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Punishment
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.