It is commonly stated that evidence, reason and logic are inadequate and

It is commonly stated that evidence, reason and logic are inadequate and

It is commonly stated that evidence, reason and logic are inadequate and inappropriate for claims of the existence of a god, transcendent or supernatural beings or phenomena, etc., and that faith alone must be relied upon. Unless I'm missing something then on these grounds, there can be no misguided faith(s), since to distinguish between misguided and valid faith one would have to give a reason why a particular faith is in one category vs. the other, contradicting its own status, correct? My question: is faith ever valid?

Read another response by Oliver Leaman
Read another response about Rationality, Religion
Print