I'm told that one game Socrates played was to ask for the definition of, for instance, courage, and then, when the interviewee responded with examples, to say, "No, no, no. Those are just examples. They won't tell me what courage is and what it isn't. What I need are necessary and sufficient conditions." Well, is it fair to say that, especially after Wittgenstein, most philosophers don't believe in hard and sharp delineations of concepts, but rather family resemblances? Or does that misconstrue both Socrates and Wittgenstein, as well as what most philosophers think?

Read another response about Language