One argument I've often heard in favor of vegetarianism is that we don't have to

One argument I've often heard in favor of vegetarianism is that we don't have to

One argument I've often heard in favor of vegetarianism is that we don't have to kill animals in order to survive. What if we, for biological reasons, were forced to eat other animals? If we couldn't digest plant matter, it would seem we wouldn't have a choice. By the logic of the argument, wouldn't that mean it would be less ethically problematic to kill other animals in order to feed?

Read another response by Richard Heck
Read another response about Animals
Print