I am confused about Aristotle's virtue ethics as it applies to Aesop's fable of

I am confused about Aristotle's virtue ethics as it applies to Aesop's fable of

I am confused about Aristotle's virtue ethics as it applies to Aesop's fable of the boy who cried wolf. Since he was telling the truth the second time, is it actually the townspeople who are behaving immorally by ignoring him? Just because the townspeople could not instantly verify the veracity of his testimony (which can be independently verified), is that really a sufficient reason to let the sheep die? By Aristotle's reasoning, is the boy (an occasional liar) just as immoral as the townspeople (by negligence)?

Read another response by Allen Stairs
Read another response about Ethics, Philosophers
Print