Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
221
 questions about 
Value
284
 questions about 
Mind
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Punishment
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
105
 questions about 
Art
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
43
 questions about 
Color
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
24
 questions about 
Suicide
67
 questions about 
Feminism
244
 questions about 
Justice
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
96
 questions about 
Time
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Animals
36
 questions about 
Literature
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
117
 questions about 
Children
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
287
 questions about 
Language
68
 questions about 
Happiness
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Biology

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.