Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Animals
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Punishment
51
 questions about 
War
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Beauty
117
 questions about 
Children
27
 questions about 
Gender
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.