Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Animals
89
 questions about 
Law
36
 questions about 
Literature
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
77
 questions about 
Emotion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Punishment
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
221
 questions about 
Value
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
54
 questions about 
Medicine
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
70
 questions about 
Truth
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.