Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
124
 questions about 
Profession
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Beauty
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
23
 questions about 
History
68
 questions about 
Happiness
218
 questions about 
Education
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
54
 questions about 
Medicine
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.