Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
392
 questions about 
Religion
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
208
 questions about 
Science
124
 questions about 
Profession
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
69
 questions about 
Business
31
 questions about 
Space
51
 questions about 
War
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
374
 questions about 
Logic
81
 questions about 
Identity
151
 questions about 
Existence
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Animals
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.