Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
287
 questions about 
Language
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Punishment
39
 questions about 
Race
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
96
 questions about 
Time
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
77
 questions about 
Emotion
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
170
 questions about 
Freedom
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.