Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
208
 questions about 
Science
81
 questions about 
Identity
27
 questions about 
Gender
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
218
 questions about 
Education
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
244
 questions about 
Justice
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
32
 questions about 
Sport
43
 questions about 
Color
39
 questions about 
Race
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.