Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

24
 questions about 
Suicide
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
134
 questions about 
Love
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
77
 questions about 
Emotion
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.