Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race
32
 questions about 
Sport
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Culture
31
 questions about 
Space
374
 questions about 
Logic
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
170
 questions about 
Freedom
221
 questions about 
Value
134
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
51
 questions about 
War
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
392
 questions about 
Religion

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.