Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Action
221
 questions about 
Value
81
 questions about 
Identity
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
287
 questions about 
Language
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
284
 questions about 
Mind
124
 questions about 
Profession
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
154
 questions about 
Sex
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Punishment
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
151
 questions about 
Existence
23
 questions about 
History
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.