Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Perception
208
 questions about 
Science
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Culture
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Action
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
117
 questions about 
Children
32
 questions about 
Sport
24
 questions about 
Suicide
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
68
 questions about 
Happiness
134
 questions about 
Love
244
 questions about 
Justice
34
 questions about 
Music
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Animals
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.