Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
23
 questions about 
History
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
117
 questions about 
Children
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
105
 questions about 
Art
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
69
 questions about 
Business
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
89
 questions about 
Law
51
 questions about 
War
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
374
 questions about 
Logic
27
 questions about 
Gender
77
 questions about 
Emotion
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.