Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
43
 questions about 
Color
24
 questions about 
Suicide
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
96
 questions about 
Time
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.