Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
170
 questions about 
Freedom
154
 questions about 
Sex
284
 questions about 
Mind
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
124
 questions about 
Profession
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
36
 questions about 
Literature
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
287
 questions about 
Language
32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
374
 questions about 
Logic
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Perception
27
 questions about 
Gender
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
96
 questions about 
Time
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.