Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
27
 questions about 
Gender
31
 questions about 
Space
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
284
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Biology
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
170
 questions about 
Freedom
43
 questions about 
Color
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
151
 questions about 
Existence
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Perception
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.