Is there a philosophical similarity between what one can't do because it's

Is there a philosophical similarity between what one can't do because it's

Is there a philosophical similarity between what one can't do because it's morally wrong, what one can't do because it is contrary to one's own aims, and what one can't do because the laws of physics prevent it? Does philosophy have something to say about these various uses of the same word that we find in several languages?

Read another response by Jonathan Westphal
Read another response about Freedom
Print