Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
4
 questions about 
Economics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
69
 questions about 
Business
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.