Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

31
 questions about 
Space
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
170
 questions about 
Freedom
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
208
 questions about 
Science
96
 questions about 
Time
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Beauty
32
 questions about 
Sport
43
 questions about 
Color
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Punishment
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
105
 questions about 
Art
54
 questions about 
Medicine
36
 questions about 
Literature
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
284
 questions about 
Mind

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.