Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Action
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
51
 questions about 
War
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.