Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
374
 questions about 
Logic
287
 questions about 
Language
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
284
 questions about 
Mind
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
31
 questions about 
Space
80
 questions about 
Death
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Biology
392
 questions about 
Religion
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Perception
69
 questions about 
Business
89
 questions about 
Law
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.