Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Perception
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
67
 questions about 
Feminism
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Biology
43
 questions about 
Color
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
70
 questions about 
Truth
221
 questions about 
Value
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
208
 questions about 
Science
154
 questions about 
Sex
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
81
 questions about 
Identity
284
 questions about 
Mind
27
 questions about 
Gender
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
34
 questions about 
Music
68
 questions about 
Happiness

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.