Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1273
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
24
 questions about 
Suicide
39
 questions about 
Race
169
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
153
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Culture
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
27
 questions about 
Gender
1
 questions about 
math
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
79
 questions about 
Death
96
 questions about 
Time
392
 questions about 
Religion
243
 questions about 
Justice
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism
283
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Action
107
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
285
 questions about 
Language
133
 questions about 
Love
573
 questions about 
Philosophy
34
 questions about 
Music
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space
70
 questions about 
Truth
124
 questions about 
Profession
87
 questions about 
Law
370
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
116
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education

Question of the Day

I agree with my colleague that "Only if A, then B" is not idiomatic English, and so it's hard to know what your teacher meant. In teaching logic over the years, I've seen many examples that take this form: "Only if A, B" — leaving the word "then" out. An English example might be the somewhat stilted but acceptable "Only if you're at least 18 are you eligible to vote." That's the same as saying "You are eligible to vote only if you're at least 18." And that's different from saying "If you're at least 18, you're eligible to vote." Saying "If you're at least 18, you're eligible to vote" means that there are no other qualifications needed; being 18 or older is enough. Saying "You're eligible to vote only if you're at least 18" allows that there may be other requirements as well, such as being a citizen. So if what your teacher meant was "Only if A, B," then perhaps my example shows that this isn't the same as "If A then B."

It sounds to me as though your teacher may be using the awkward expression "Only if A, then B" as a way of asserting the biconditional "A if and only if B," which is equivalent to the biconditional "B if and only if A." As I say, the expression is awkward, but in any case I wouldn't read it as adding a modal operator like "Necessarily" to the conditional "If A, then B." Whoever wants to say "necessarily" really needs to use that word.

Other than your teacher's decision, I can't think of any reason to treat "Only if A, then B" as the biconditional "A if and only if B." The form "Only if A, then B" isn't something you'll encounter in idiomatic English. Competent speakers wouldn't say, "Only if all humans are mortals, then all nonmortals are nonhuman." Instead, they'd say "All humans are mortals if and only if all nonmortals are nonhumans." But it's probably wise to follow your teacher's decision, at least until you're done with the course!