Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

34
 questions about 
Music
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Culture
88
 questions about 
Physics
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
117
 questions about 
Children
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
244
 questions about 
Justice
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
24
 questions about 
Suicide
208
 questions about 
Science
221
 questions about 
Value
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.