Add this site to your Home Screen by opening it in Safari, tapping and selecting "Add to home screen"
Our panel of 90 professional philosophers has responded to
- 142 Existence
- 27 Gender
- 123 Profession
- 64 Truth
- 43 Color
- 108 Biology
- 58 Punishment
- 30 Space
- 78 Identity
- 36 Race
- 351 Logic
- 1246 Ethics
- 73 Perception
- 153 Sex
- 130 Love
- 106 Animals
- 114 Children
- 87 Law
- 2 Culture
- 84 Physics
- 76 Emotion
- 269 Knowledge
- 378 Religion
- 23 Suicide
- 93 Time
- 5 Euthanasia
- 70 Business
- 4 Economics
- 78 Death
- 103 Art
- 67 Feminism
- 22 History
- 33 Music
- 58 Abortion
- 54 Medicine
- 164 Freedom
- 241 Justice
- 50 War
- 211 Value
- 36 Literature
- 2 Action
- 203 Science
- 275 Language
- 73 Beauty
- 65 Happiness
- 31 Sport
- 277 Mind
- 563 Philosophy
- 215 Education
Restricting consideration only to the qualification “best for the Earth,” where that means something like best for the well being of current eco-systems and current non-human populations, I think the answer is yes, it would be better if we all dropped dead, especially if “this rate” of destruction remains unchanged. But, of course, what is best for the current eco-systems and current populations must be weighed against other considerations such as what is “best for” certain projects and cultural formations we also rightly value—human communities, nations, literary, scientific, spiritual, and artistic projects. It is true, indeed, that those will disappear along with the rest of life on the planet if ecological destruction continues beyond the point at which human life or those projects can be sustained. It’s not clear, however, that the current rate of destruction will persist or that we will reach that point. It is not clear that it won’t or that we won’t, either. There seems to be a reasonable likelihood that the course we’re on is not only suicidal but also ecocidal, and so this question will remain meaningful and compelling. For myself, I think we face a serious obligation to reduce human impact upon the world both by reducing consumption per capita and by reducing population generally.