Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Truth
166
 questions about 
Freedom
79
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
104
 questions about 
Art
1270
 questions about 
Ethics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
38
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
243
 questions about 
Justice
153
 questions about 
Sex
364
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
151
 questions about 
Existence
219
 questions about 
Value
96
 questions about 
Time
24
 questions about 
Suicide
54
 questions about 
Medicine
285
 questions about 
Language
27
 questions about 
Gender
389
 questions about 
Religion
5
 questions about 
Economics
216
 questions about 
Education
133
 questions about 
Love
107
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
87
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Action
74
 questions about 
Beauty
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Perception
115
 questions about 
Children
280
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
570
 questions about 
Philosophy
67
 questions about 
Feminism
125
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science

Question of the Day

If there is a paradox here, I don't think it will have anything to do with a conflict in the conditions for set membership. Let's leave aside that there may be sorites-style paradoxes arising from the vagueness of the predicates "young girl" and even "female human." I suspect that those paradoxes can be solved in the "epistemicist" way (see this link).

One and the same individual can possess various mutually consistent properties: she can be a young girl (at a specified time t), a female human being (at any time during her existence, including at time t), and so on. So Miss X can belong to the set of girls who are young at t, the set of female human beings, the set of human beings, the set of mammals, the set of things referred to by you in your question above, etc. She would belong to each of those different sets for different but compatible reasons. I don't see anything paradoxical about that.