Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
43
 questions about 
Color
39
 questions about 
Race
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals
24
 questions about 
Suicide
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Abortion
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
80
 questions about 
Death
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.