Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Action
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
70
 questions about 
Truth
23
 questions about 
History
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
374
 questions about 
Logic
27
 questions about 
Gender
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
208
 questions about 
Science
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
284
 questions about 
Mind
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
67
 questions about 
Feminism
117
 questions about 
Children
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.