Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Beauty
75
 questions about 
Perception
54
 questions about 
Medicine
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
89
 questions about 
Law
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
39
 questions about 
Race
96
 questions about 
Time
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
374
 questions about 
Logic
80
 questions about 
Death
134
 questions about 
Love
27
 questions about 
Gender
88
 questions about 
Physics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
43
 questions about 
Color
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War
392
 questions about 
Religion
154
 questions about 
Sex
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.