Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

36
 questions about 
Literature
34
 questions about 
Music
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
27
 questions about 
Gender
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
117
 questions about 
Children
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
105
 questions about 
Art
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
287
 questions about 
Language
89
 questions about 
Law
81
 questions about 
Identity
54
 questions about 
Medicine
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Abortion
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
284
 questions about 
Mind
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.