Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
4
 questions about 
Economics
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
43
 questions about 
Color
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
70
 questions about 
Truth
88
 questions about 
Physics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
287
 questions about 
Language
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
77
 questions about 
Emotion
244
 questions about 
Justice
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.