Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Perception
81
 questions about 
Identity
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
80
 questions about 
Death
34
 questions about 
Music
117
 questions about 
Children
151
 questions about 
Existence
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Punishment
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
4
 questions about 
Economics
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
124
 questions about 
Profession
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
170
 questions about 
Freedom
154
 questions about 
Sex
134
 questions about 
Love
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.