Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Perception
244
 questions about 
Justice
151
 questions about 
Existence
134
 questions about 
Love
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
154
 questions about 
Sex
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
170
 questions about 
Freedom
31
 questions about 
Space
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
54
 questions about 
Medicine
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Beauty
23
 questions about 
History
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.