Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
31
 questions about 
Space
54
 questions about 
Medicine
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Punishment
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Action
51
 questions about 
War
77
 questions about 
Emotion
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
244
 questions about 
Justice
69
 questions about 
Business
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
43
 questions about 
Color
151
 questions about 
Existence

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.