Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Action
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
221
 questions about 
Value
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Culture
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
117
 questions about 
Children
24
 questions about 
Suicide
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Perception
36
 questions about 
Literature
392
 questions about 
Religion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
88
 questions about 
Physics
208
 questions about 
Science
374
 questions about 
Logic
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
39
 questions about 
Race
80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.