Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
151
 questions about 
Existence
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Animals
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
374
 questions about 
Logic
287
 questions about 
Language
68
 questions about 
Happiness
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
31
 questions about 
Space
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
105
 questions about 
Art
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Abortion
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
77
 questions about 
Emotion
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.