Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
69
 questions about 
Business
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
117
 questions about 
Children
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
105
 questions about 
Art
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
218
 questions about 
Education
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.