Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
68
 questions about 
Happiness
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
4
 questions about 
Economics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Action
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
154
 questions about 
Sex
88
 questions about 
Physics
287
 questions about 
Language
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
51
 questions about 
War
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Abortion
23
 questions about 
History
244
 questions about 
Justice
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
39
 questions about 
Race
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
284
 questions about 
Mind
96
 questions about 
Time
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Animals
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.