Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
54
 questions about 
Medicine
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
170
 questions about 
Freedom
244
 questions about 
Justice
124
 questions about 
Profession
151
 questions about 
Existence
69
 questions about 
Business
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Action
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Biology
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Perception
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
96
 questions about 
Time
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.