Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Action
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
43
 questions about 
Color
287
 questions about 
Language
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
374
 questions about 
Logic
24
 questions about 
Suicide
392
 questions about 
Religion
221
 questions about 
Value
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
88
 questions about 
Physics
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.