Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

23
 questions about 
History
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
24
 questions about 
Suicide
117
 questions about 
Children
31
 questions about 
Space
124
 questions about 
Profession
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.