Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Culture
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
221
 questions about 
Value
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Beauty
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.