Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
77
 questions about 
Emotion
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
24
 questions about 
Suicide
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
105
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence
23
 questions about 
History
374
 questions about 
Logic
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
34
 questions about 
Music
68
 questions about 
Happiness
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.