Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
77
 questions about 
Emotion
88
 questions about 
Physics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Animals
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
287
 questions about 
Language
69
 questions about 
Business
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
218
 questions about 
Education
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
574
 questions about 
Philosophy

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.