Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
34
 questions about 
Music
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
24
 questions about 
Suicide
69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
89
 questions about 
Law
117
 questions about 
Children
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
96
 questions about 
Time
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
208
 questions about 
Science
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
36
 questions about 
Literature
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.