Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Perception
218
 questions about 
Education
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
89
 questions about 
Law
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Culture
244
 questions about 
Justice
284
 questions about 
Mind
287
 questions about 
Language
54
 questions about 
Medicine
374
 questions about 
Logic
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science
32
 questions about 
Sport
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Biology

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.