Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
27
 questions about 
Gender
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Biology
374
 questions about 
Logic
77
 questions about 
Emotion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
392
 questions about 
Religion
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
36
 questions about 
Literature
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
105
 questions about 
Art
287
 questions about 
Language
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
23
 questions about 
History
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
284
 questions about 
Mind
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Punishment

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.