Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
77
 questions about 
Emotion
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
81
 questions about 
Identity
70
 questions about 
Truth
117
 questions about 
Children
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
284
 questions about 
Mind

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.