Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Punishment
36
 questions about 
Literature
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Beauty
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
70
 questions about 
Truth
170
 questions about 
Freedom
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
89
 questions about 
Law
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
88
 questions about 
Physics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.