Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Biology
287
 questions about 
Language
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
105
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender
68
 questions about 
Happiness
88
 questions about 
Physics
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.