Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
284
 questions about 
Mind
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Perception
105
 questions about 
Art
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
218
 questions about 
Education
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Action
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
34
 questions about 
Music
36
 questions about 
Literature
208
 questions about 
Science
81
 questions about 
Identity
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Animals
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.