Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Biology
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Perception
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love
32
 questions about 
Sport
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
43
 questions about 
Color
392
 questions about 
Religion

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.