Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
170
 questions about 
Freedom
70
 questions about 
Truth
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
208
 questions about 
Science
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Action
284
 questions about 
Mind
374
 questions about 
Logic
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
287
 questions about 
Language
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
80
 questions about 
Death
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.