Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
69
 questions about 
Business
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
124
 questions about 
Profession
51
 questions about 
War
96
 questions about 
Time
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
81
 questions about 
Identity
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
32
 questions about 
Sport
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Animals
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
374
 questions about 
Logic
134
 questions about 
Love
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.