Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
88
 questions about 
Physics
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Animals
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
218
 questions about 
Education
81
 questions about 
Identity
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
287
 questions about 
Language
374
 questions about 
Logic
68
 questions about 
Happiness

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.