Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Animals
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
36
 questions about 
Literature
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception
4
 questions about 
Economics
23
 questions about 
History
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.