Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
244
 questions about 
Justice
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
80
 questions about 
Death
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
117
 questions about 
Children
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Biology
27
 questions about 
Gender
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
81
 questions about 
Identity
124
 questions about 
Profession
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Action
221
 questions about 
Value
392
 questions about 
Religion
43
 questions about 
Color
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
23
 questions about 
History
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.