Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

81
 questions about 
Identity
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Punishment
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Action
117
 questions about 
Children
51
 questions about 
War
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Beauty
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
151
 questions about 
Existence
68
 questions about 
Happiness
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Biology
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Animals
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
218
 questions about 
Education
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.