Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
39
 questions about 
Race
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
54
 questions about 
Medicine
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Beauty
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Abortion
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
36
 questions about 
Literature
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
284
 questions about 
Mind
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.