Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
36
 questions about 
Literature
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Punishment
374
 questions about 
Logic
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Perception
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Animals
134
 questions about 
Love
54
 questions about 
Medicine
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
88
 questions about 
Physics
392
 questions about 
Religion
89
 questions about 
Law
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
23
 questions about 
History

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.