Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
51
 questions about 
War
23
 questions about 
History
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Action
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
34
 questions about 
Music
67
 questions about 
Feminism
43
 questions about 
Color
24
 questions about 
Suicide
221
 questions about 
Value
70
 questions about 
Truth
208
 questions about 
Science
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
80
 questions about 
Death
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
31
 questions about 
Space
392
 questions about 
Religion
124
 questions about 
Profession

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.