Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Culture
24
 questions about 
Suicide
4
 questions about 
Economics
81
 questions about 
Identity
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
39
 questions about 
Race
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Perception
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
218
 questions about 
Education
284
 questions about 
Mind
392
 questions about 
Religion
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
151
 questions about 
Existence
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Abortion
88
 questions about 
Physics
170
 questions about 
Freedom

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.