Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
89
 questions about 
Law
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
77
 questions about 
Emotion
34
 questions about 
Music
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
51
 questions about 
War
208
 questions about 
Science
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
244
 questions about 
Justice
218
 questions about 
Education
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
24
 questions about 
Suicide
374
 questions about 
Logic
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Culture
88
 questions about 
Physics
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
221
 questions about 
Value
284
 questions about 
Mind
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.