Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

81
 questions about 
Identity
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
34
 questions about 
Music
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
69
 questions about 
Business
89
 questions about 
Law
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
284
 questions about 
Mind
221
 questions about 
Value
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
208
 questions about 
Science
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Abortion
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
43
 questions about 
Color
67
 questions about 
Feminism
70
 questions about 
Truth
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
27
 questions about 
Gender
218
 questions about 
Education
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.