Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
154
 questions about 
Sex
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
54
 questions about 
Medicine
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
43
 questions about 
Color
27
 questions about 
Gender
34
 questions about 
Music
69
 questions about 
Business
36
 questions about 
Literature
117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
81
 questions about 
Identity
287
 questions about 
Language
80
 questions about 
Death
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
23
 questions about 
History

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.