Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
31
 questions about 
Space
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
32
 questions about 
Sport
392
 questions about 
Religion
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Abortion
374
 questions about 
Logic
4
 questions about 
Economics
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
151
 questions about 
Existence
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
36
 questions about 
Literature
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.