Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
284
 questions about 
Mind
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Biology
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
134
 questions about 
Love
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Punishment
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
88
 questions about 
Physics
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Abortion
23
 questions about 
History
36
 questions about 
Literature
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
80
 questions about 
Death
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
105
 questions about 
Art
34
 questions about 
Music
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
1280
 questions about 
Ethics

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.