Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
89
 questions about 
Law
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
96
 questions about 
Time
34
 questions about 
Music
221
 questions about 
Value
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Culture
31
 questions about 
Space
32
 questions about 
Sport
54
 questions about 
Medicine
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.