Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Beauty
36
 questions about 
Literature
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Perception
218
 questions about 
Education
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
67
 questions about 
Feminism
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
34
 questions about 
Music
69
 questions about 
Business
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
81
 questions about 
Identity
23
 questions about 
History
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
88
 questions about 
Physics
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.