Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
43
 questions about 
Color
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
124
 questions about 
Profession
374
 questions about 
Logic
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
208
 questions about 
Science
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Action
34
 questions about 
Music
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Biology
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
221
 questions about 
Value
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Animals
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.