Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Animals
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
284
 questions about 
Mind
151
 questions about 
Existence
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
81
 questions about 
Identity
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Beauty
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
31
 questions about 
Space
68
 questions about 
Happiness
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Punishment
244
 questions about 
Justice
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Perception
27
 questions about 
Gender

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.