Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
221
 questions about 
Value
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
54
 questions about 
Medicine
154
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
36
 questions about 
Literature
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
4
 questions about 
Economics
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
70
 questions about 
Truth
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
34
 questions about 
Music
218
 questions about 
Education

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.