Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
24
 questions about 
Suicide
68
 questions about 
Happiness
54
 questions about 
Medicine
23
 questions about 
History
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics
154
 questions about 
Sex
218
 questions about 
Education
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
32
 questions about 
Sport
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
134
 questions about 
Love
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Punishment
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.