Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.