Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Perception
244
 questions about 
Justice
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
54
 questions about 
Medicine
89
 questions about 
Law
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
218
 questions about 
Education
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Biology
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Abortion
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
124
 questions about 
Profession
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
23
 questions about 
History
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.