Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
284
 questions about 
Mind
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
24
 questions about 
Suicide
105
 questions about 
Art
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
23
 questions about 
History
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Action
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Animals
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
77
 questions about 
Emotion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.