Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Punishment
43
 questions about 
Color
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Beauty
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Culture
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
68
 questions about 
Happiness
39
 questions about 
Race
36
 questions about 
Literature
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
134
 questions about 
Love
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
77
 questions about 
Emotion
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.