Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

170
 questions about 
Freedom
68
 questions about 
Happiness
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
43
 questions about 
Color
39
 questions about 
Race
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
124
 questions about 
Profession
284
 questions about 
Mind
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.