Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Punishment
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Animals
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
68
 questions about 
Happiness
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
27
 questions about 
Gender
31
 questions about 
Space
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
117
 questions about 
Children
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Culture
80
 questions about 
Death
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.