Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Biology
110
 questions about 
Animals
287
 questions about 
Language
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
208
 questions about 
Science
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
23
 questions about 
History
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Abortion
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Beauty
392
 questions about 
Religion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.