Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
208
 questions about 
Science
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
77
 questions about 
Emotion
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
244
 questions about 
Justice
27
 questions about 
Gender
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
51
 questions about 
War
39
 questions about 
Race
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
89
 questions about 
Law
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
374
 questions about 
Logic
4
 questions about 
Economics
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Punishment
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Culture
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.