Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
54
 questions about 
Medicine
221
 questions about 
Value
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Perception
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
67
 questions about 
Feminism
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
31
 questions about 
Space
170
 questions about 
Freedom
374
 questions about 
Logic
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
43
 questions about 
Color
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
284
 questions about 
Mind
96
 questions about 
Time
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Biology
34
 questions about 
Music
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
27
 questions about 
Gender

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.