Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
151
 questions about 
Existence
81
 questions about 
Identity
88
 questions about 
Physics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
284
 questions about 
Mind
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
34
 questions about 
Music
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
77
 questions about 
Emotion

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.