Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Beauty
54
 questions about 
Medicine
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
31
 questions about 
Space
96
 questions about 
Time
218
 questions about 
Education
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
392
 questions about 
Religion
124
 questions about 
Profession
51
 questions about 
War
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
27
 questions about 
Gender
68
 questions about 
Happiness
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.