Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Biology
208
 questions about 
Science
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
36
 questions about 
Literature
392
 questions about 
Religion
89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
27
 questions about 
Gender
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
43
 questions about 
Color
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
96
 questions about 
Time
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
24
 questions about 
Suicide
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Punishment
154
 questions about 
Sex

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.