Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

284
 questions about 
Mind
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
392
 questions about 
Religion
80
 questions about 
Death
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Biology
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
244
 questions about 
Justice
208
 questions about 
Science
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
36
 questions about 
Literature
77
 questions about 
Emotion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception
374
 questions about 
Logic
4
 questions about 
Economics
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
39
 questions about 
Race
154
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
81
 questions about 
Identity
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.