Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
32
 questions about 
Sport
67
 questions about 
Feminism
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Punishment
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
392
 questions about 
Religion
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Abortion
244
 questions about 
Justice
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
27
 questions about 
Gender
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Action
154
 questions about 
Sex
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
54
 questions about 
Medicine
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.