Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

27
 questions about 
Gender
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
287
 questions about 
Language
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
54
 questions about 
Medicine
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
51
 questions about 
War
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Abortion
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
23
 questions about 
History
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
89
 questions about 
Law
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
77
 questions about 
Emotion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
88
 questions about 
Physics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.