Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
89
 questions about 
Law
218
 questions about 
Education
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.