Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Action
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
151
 questions about 
Existence
284
 questions about 
Mind
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
89
 questions about 
Law
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
69
 questions about 
Business
218
 questions about 
Education
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
96
 questions about 
Time
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.