Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
77
 questions about 
Emotion
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
43
 questions about 
Color
54
 questions about 
Medicine
58
 questions about 
Abortion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
124
 questions about 
Profession
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
134
 questions about 
Love
24
 questions about 
Suicide
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Biology
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Animals
218
 questions about 
Education
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
287
 questions about 
Language
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
374
 questions about 
Logic
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.