Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Abortion
244
 questions about 
Justice
218
 questions about 
Education
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
96
 questions about 
Time
117
 questions about 
Children
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
36
 questions about 
Literature
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
23
 questions about 
History
374
 questions about 
Logic
67
 questions about 
Feminism
105
 questions about 
Art
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
124
 questions about 
Profession
134
 questions about 
Love
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.