Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
124
 questions about 
Profession
151
 questions about 
Existence
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
284
 questions about 
Mind
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Action

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.