Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Culture
34
 questions about 
Music
24
 questions about 
Suicide
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
70
 questions about 
Truth
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Perception
54
 questions about 
Medicine
221
 questions about 
Value
77
 questions about 
Emotion
88
 questions about 
Physics
31
 questions about 
Space
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
284
 questions about 
Mind

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.