Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
36
 questions about 
Literature
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.