Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
81
 questions about 
Identity
88
 questions about 
Physics
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
284
 questions about 
Mind
117
 questions about 
Children
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
244
 questions about 
Justice
32
 questions about 
Sport
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
80
 questions about 
Death
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
151
 questions about 
Existence
68
 questions about 
Happiness
208
 questions about 
Science
170
 questions about 
Freedom
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.