Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

374
 questions about 
Logic
43
 questions about 
Color
32
 questions about 
Sport
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Biology
24
 questions about 
Suicide
105
 questions about 
Art
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
287
 questions about 
Language
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Culture
96
 questions about 
Time
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Abortion
51
 questions about 
War
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Beauty
117
 questions about 
Children
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Perception
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.