Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
27
 questions about 
Gender
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Culture
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
81
 questions about 
Identity
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
24
 questions about 
Suicide
36
 questions about 
Literature
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
43
 questions about 
Color
54
 questions about 
Medicine

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.