Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
27
 questions about 
Gender
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
374
 questions about 
Logic
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
23
 questions about 
History
24
 questions about 
Suicide
39
 questions about 
Race
96
 questions about 
Time
34
 questions about 
Music
81
 questions about 
Identity
124
 questions about 
Profession
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
154
 questions about 
Sex
208
 questions about 
Science
105
 questions about 
Art
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Perception
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.