Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Biology
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
39
 questions about 
Race
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
27
 questions about 
Gender
134
 questions about 
Love
24
 questions about 
Suicide

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.