Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Action
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
208
 questions about 
Science
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
51
 questions about 
War
151
 questions about 
Existence
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Animals
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
67
 questions about 
Feminism
105
 questions about 
Art
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
43
 questions about 
Color
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
134
 questions about 
Love
24
 questions about 
Suicide
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
221
 questions about 
Value
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
27
 questions about 
Gender
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.