Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
68
 questions about 
Happiness
96
 questions about 
Time
221
 questions about 
Value
244
 questions about 
Justice
88
 questions about 
Physics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
70
 questions about 
Truth
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Perception
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Action
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.