Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
96
 questions about 
Time
284
 questions about 
Mind
124
 questions about 
Profession
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
70
 questions about 
Truth
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
89
 questions about 
Law
117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
77
 questions about 
Emotion
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.