Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

574
 questions about 
Philosophy
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Action
51
 questions about 
War
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Beauty
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
54
 questions about 
Medicine
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Punishment
88
 questions about 
Physics
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
374
 questions about 
Logic
170
 questions about 
Freedom
392
 questions about 
Religion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Biology
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.