Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
96
 questions about 
Time
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
68
 questions about 
Happiness
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
374
 questions about 
Logic
151
 questions about 
Existence
36
 questions about 
Literature
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.