Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History
374
 questions about 
Logic
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
31
 questions about 
Space
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
4
 questions about 
Economics
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
105
 questions about 
Art

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.