Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
36
 questions about 
Literature
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Biology
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
151
 questions about 
Existence
244
 questions about 
Justice
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
117
 questions about 
Children
54
 questions about 
Medicine
221
 questions about 
Value
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.