Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
31
 questions about 
Space
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
244
 questions about 
Justice
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
96
 questions about 
Time
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
287
 questions about 
Language
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Action
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
54
 questions about 
Medicine

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.