Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Perception
68
 questions about 
Happiness
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
34
 questions about 
Music
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Abortion
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
244
 questions about 
Justice
4
 questions about 
Economics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
117
 questions about 
Children
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
77
 questions about 
Emotion

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.