Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
23
 questions about 
History
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
134
 questions about 
Love
284
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
124
 questions about 
Profession
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
70
 questions about 
Truth
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Animals
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.