Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Action
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
134
 questions about 
Love
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
117
 questions about 
Children
4
 questions about 
Economics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
69
 questions about 
Business
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Punishment
34
 questions about 
Music
43
 questions about 
Color
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
67
 questions about 
Feminism
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
124
 questions about 
Profession
374
 questions about 
Logic
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.