Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
221
 questions about 
Value
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Animals
105
 questions about 
Art
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
67
 questions about 
Feminism
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Abortion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
81
 questions about 
Identity
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
374
 questions about 
Logic
69
 questions about 
Business
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Perception
23
 questions about 
History
124
 questions about 
Profession
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
43
 questions about 
Color
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
68
 questions about 
Happiness
284
 questions about 
Mind
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.