Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
287
 questions about 
Language
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
218
 questions about 
Education
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Abortion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
244
 questions about 
Justice
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.