Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
34
 questions about 
Music
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
117
 questions about 
Children
151
 questions about 
Existence
54
 questions about 
Medicine
287
 questions about 
Language
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Action
68
 questions about 
Happiness
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Culture
36
 questions about 
Literature
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.