Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
23
 questions about 
History
24
 questions about 
Suicide
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
374
 questions about 
Logic
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
287
 questions about 
Language
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
54
 questions about 
Medicine
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
392
 questions about 
Religion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Animals
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.