Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
287
 questions about 
Language
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
23
 questions about 
History
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
154
 questions about 
Sex
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
244
 questions about 
Justice
69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
43
 questions about 
Color
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.