Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
43
 questions about 
Color
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
117
 questions about 
Children
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Abortion
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
392
 questions about 
Religion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
244
 questions about 
Justice
287
 questions about 
Language
67
 questions about 
Feminism
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Action
154
 questions about 
Sex
105
 questions about 
Art
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
34
 questions about 
Music
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Punishment
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.