Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
43
 questions about 
Color
51
 questions about 
War
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
221
 questions about 
Value
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Beauty
70
 questions about 
Truth
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
80
 questions about 
Death
69
 questions about 
Business
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
77
 questions about 
Emotion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
4
 questions about 
Economics

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.