Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
170
 questions about 
Freedom
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Perception
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
34
 questions about 
Music
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Punishment
89
 questions about 
Law
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.