Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

374
 questions about 
Logic
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
67
 questions about 
Feminism
117
 questions about 
Children
77
 questions about 
Emotion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
69
 questions about 
Business
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Culture
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
70
 questions about 
Truth
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
221
 questions about 
Value
81
 questions about 
Identity
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
392
 questions about 
Religion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
284
 questions about 
Mind
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.