Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

282
 questions about 
Knowledge
69
 questions about 
Business
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Culture
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
151
 questions about 
Existence
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Perception
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
70
 questions about 
Truth
218
 questions about 
Education
54
 questions about 
Medicine
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
27
 questions about 
Gender
1280
 questions about 
Ethics

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.