Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Animals
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
134
 questions about 
Love
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
67
 questions about 
Feminism
51
 questions about 
War
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
284
 questions about 
Mind
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Beauty
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
68
 questions about 
Happiness
124
 questions about 
Profession
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
117
 questions about 
Children

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.