Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
89
 questions about 
Law
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
67
 questions about 
Feminism
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
58
 questions about 
Abortion
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
151
 questions about 
Existence
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
32
 questions about 
Sport
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.