Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Punishment
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
117
 questions about 
Children
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
208
 questions about 
Science
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
221
 questions about 
Value
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
54
 questions about 
Medicine
34
 questions about 
Music
36
 questions about 
Literature
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
24
 questions about 
Suicide
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
218
 questions about 
Education
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.