Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
134
 questions about 
Love
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
31
 questions about 
Space
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
392
 questions about 
Religion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Punishment
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine
80
 questions about 
Death
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
208
 questions about 
Science
34
 questions about 
Music
24
 questions about 
Suicide
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.