Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

31
 questions about 
Space
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
96
 questions about 
Time
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
4
 questions about 
Economics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
34
 questions about 
Music
77
 questions about 
Emotion
81
 questions about 
Identity
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
88
 questions about 
Physics
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.