Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Beauty
96
 questions about 
Time
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
81
 questions about 
Identity
154
 questions about 
Sex
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Culture
170
 questions about 
Freedom
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Abortion
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Biology
43
 questions about 
Color
392
 questions about 
Religion
134
 questions about 
Love
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Action
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
36
 questions about 
Literature
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Perception
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
80
 questions about 
Death
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.