Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
34
 questions about 
Music
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals
151
 questions about 
Existence
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
221
 questions about 
Value
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
124
 questions about 
Profession
51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Culture
43
 questions about 
Color
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Punishment
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception
208
 questions about 
Science
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
88
 questions about 
Physics
36
 questions about 
Literature

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.