Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
244
 questions about 
Justice
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
208
 questions about 
Science
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
221
 questions about 
Value
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
117
 questions about 
Children
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.