Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

58
 questions about 
Punishment
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Beauty
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
51
 questions about 
War
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Culture
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
89
 questions about 
Law
32
 questions about 
Sport
88
 questions about 
Physics
154
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
36
 questions about 
Literature
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
23
 questions about 
History
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.