Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
23
 questions about 
History
170
 questions about 
Freedom
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
69
 questions about 
Business
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
151
 questions about 
Existence
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Beauty
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
68
 questions about 
Happiness
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Culture
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
51
 questions about 
War
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.