Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
27
 questions about 
Gender
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
88
 questions about 
Physics
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.