Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Perception
244
 questions about 
Justice
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
69
 questions about 
Business
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
105
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Beauty
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
81
 questions about 
Identity
68
 questions about 
Happiness
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
208
 questions about 
Science
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.