Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
31
 questions about 
Space
51
 questions about 
War
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
392
 questions about 
Religion
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Perception
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
221
 questions about 
Value
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind
374
 questions about 
Logic
134
 questions about 
Love
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.