Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
170
 questions about 
Freedom
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
80
 questions about 
Death
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
4
 questions about 
Economics
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
96
 questions about 
Time
221
 questions about 
Value
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
244
 questions about 
Justice
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
392
 questions about 
Religion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
374
 questions about 
Logic
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
151
 questions about 
Existence
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
68
 questions about 
Happiness

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.