Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
68
 questions about 
Happiness
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
81
 questions about 
Identity
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
43
 questions about 
Color
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Perception
244
 questions about 
Justice
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
208
 questions about 
Science
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Punishment
51
 questions about 
War
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Action
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
89
 questions about 
Law
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
124
 questions about 
Profession
24
 questions about 
Suicide
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

Funny you should ask. It's grading season and I've spent a chunk of my day reading essays by freshmen. Some are pretty well-written; others not so much. I'm with your prof.

If I sent a paper full of bad grammar to a philosophy journal, it would either be rejected or, if it was otherwise worth considering, would be sent back for revision. You can think of either of these as the professional equivalent of getting points knocked off.

But aside from what happens in the profession, I don't see my role as narrowly as you think I should. Part of the point of my essay assignments is to improve their strictly philosophical skills. But I take it to be part of my job to help students learn to write better essays in general. I don't think that this falls only to the writing teachers in the English department; I don't have that sort of siloed view of a university education.

I'd add: experience suggests that ungrammatical prose often goes with careless or even muddled thinking. And it makes it more likely that the reader will misunderstand or (a different matter, but still...) get annoyed and just stop reading.

If it makes you feel any better, if you submitted a paper to me that showed philosophical insight, careful thought, and overall clear expression, I would dock you not at all for a handful of minor grammatical lapses. But if it rose to the point of being annoying, I wouldn't give you as good a grade as I would have if you not only were doing good philosophy but also had produced a better essay.

-----
And by the way: if I were grading your question, I might suggest that you re-write it, perhaps this way:

Hi, I'm a college freshman taking my first philosophy class. My professor takes points off for grammatical mistakes. I disagree with this approach. Aren't the ideas the most important thing, especially for philosophy?

That way, your reader will pay attention to what you say, and not to lapses in the way you say it.

Grammatical mistakes in a student's paper get in the way when I'm trying to follow what s/he's saying. If you want to persuade someone of something, don't distract them. Bad grammar (and more generally, bad writing) can be very distracting.