Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
32
 questions about 
Sport
374
 questions about 
Logic
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
51
 questions about 
War
105
 questions about 
Art
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Biology
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
23
 questions about 
History
154
 questions about 
Sex
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.