Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Culture
88
 questions about 
Physics
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Punishment
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
124
 questions about 
Profession
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
244
 questions about 
Justice
170
 questions about 
Freedom
27
 questions about 
Gender
80
 questions about 
Death
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
81
 questions about 
Identity
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
89
 questions about 
Law
34
 questions about 
Music
36
 questions about 
Literature
70
 questions about 
Truth
208
 questions about 
Science
43
 questions about 
Color
39
 questions about 
Race
221
 questions about 
Value
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology
4
 questions about 
Economics

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.