Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
218
 questions about 
Education
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Animals
67
 questions about 
Feminism
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
392
 questions about 
Religion
124
 questions about 
Profession
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
88
 questions about 
Physics

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.