Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

54
 questions about 
Medicine
34
 questions about 
Music
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
287
 questions about 
Language
68
 questions about 
Happiness
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
208
 questions about 
Science
67
 questions about 
Feminism
124
 questions about 
Profession
24
 questions about 
Suicide
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
31
 questions about 
Space
117
 questions about 
Children
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
70
 questions about 
Truth
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Abortion

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.