Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

39
 questions about 
Race
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
24
 questions about 
Suicide
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
70
 questions about 
Truth
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
96
 questions about 
Time
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music
67
 questions about 
Feminism
89
 questions about 
Law
68
 questions about 
Happiness
105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
151
 questions about 
Existence
574
 questions about 
Philosophy

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.