Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

374
 questions about 
Logic
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
117
 questions about 
Children
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
221
 questions about 
Value
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
34
 questions about 
Music
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
392
 questions about 
Religion
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
27
 questions about 
Gender
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
54
 questions about 
Medicine
287
 questions about 
Language
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Animals
80
 questions about 
Death
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Abortion

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.