Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

392
 questions about 
Religion
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education
151
 questions about 
Existence
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Abortion
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
287
 questions about 
Language
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
27
 questions about 
Gender
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Action
39
 questions about 
Race
124
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
51
 questions about 
War
32
 questions about 
Sport
96
 questions about 
Time
77
 questions about 
Emotion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
67
 questions about 
Feminism
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
34
 questions about 
Music
81
 questions about 
Identity
170
 questions about 
Freedom

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.