Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Perception
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
105
 questions about 
Art
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
43
 questions about 
Color
80
 questions about 
Death
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
24
 questions about 
Suicide
68
 questions about 
Happiness
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.