Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Punishment
51
 questions about 
War
54
 questions about 
Medicine
4
 questions about 
Economics
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
34
 questions about 
Music
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Animals
105
 questions about 
Art
39
 questions about 
Race
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
170
 questions about 
Freedom
43
 questions about 
Color
27
 questions about 
Gender
218
 questions about 
Education
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Perception
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
31
 questions about 
Space
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.