Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
32
 questions about 
Sport
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
89
 questions about 
Law
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
124
 questions about 
Profession
68
 questions about 
Happiness
54
 questions about 
Medicine
392
 questions about 
Religion
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Biology
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
117
 questions about 
Children
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Perception
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
88
 questions about 
Physics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
244
 questions about 
Justice
24
 questions about 
Suicide
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
96
 questions about 
Time

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.