Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Biology
67
 questions about 
Feminism
124
 questions about 
Profession
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Punishment
36
 questions about 
Literature
287
 questions about 
Language
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
34
 questions about 
Music
80
 questions about 
Death
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
170
 questions about 
Freedom
221
 questions about 
Value
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.