Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Culture
27
 questions about 
Gender
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Punishment
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Biology
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Animals
68
 questions about 
Happiness
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Abortion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
154
 questions about 
Sex
124
 questions about 
Profession
151
 questions about 
Existence
244
 questions about 
Justice
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.