Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
36
 questions about 
Literature
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
208
 questions about 
Science
67
 questions about 
Feminism
117
 questions about 
Children
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.