Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
27
 questions about 
Gender
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
34
 questions about 
Music
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
23
 questions about 
History
96
 questions about 
Time
32
 questions about 
Sport
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice
287
 questions about 
Language
208
 questions about 
Science
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Animals

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.