Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
4
 questions about 
Economics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Action
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
88
 questions about 
Physics
89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
77
 questions about 
Emotion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.