Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

221
 questions about 
Value
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
117
 questions about 
Children
54
 questions about 
Medicine
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Biology
43
 questions about 
Color
170
 questions about 
Freedom
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
23
 questions about 
History
4
 questions about 
Economics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
88
 questions about 
Physics
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
36
 questions about 
Literature
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Abortion

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.