Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
154
 questions about 
Sex
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
34
 questions about 
Music
39
 questions about 
Race
77
 questions about 
Emotion
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
218
 questions about 
Education
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Beauty
284
 questions about 
Mind
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.