Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
77
 questions about 
Emotion
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Culture
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
218
 questions about 
Education
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
105
 questions about 
Art
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
24
 questions about 
Suicide
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
4
 questions about 
Economics
89
 questions about 
Law

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.