Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
68
 questions about 
Happiness
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Biology
208
 questions about 
Science
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
27
 questions about 
Gender
88
 questions about 
Physics
374
 questions about 
Logic
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Abortion
287
 questions about 
Language
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
218
 questions about 
Education
54
 questions about 
Medicine
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
96
 questions about 
Time
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
89
 questions about 
Law
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.