Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
69
 questions about 
Business
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
43
 questions about 
Color
4
 questions about 
Economics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
284
 questions about 
Mind
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
124
 questions about 
Profession
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
218
 questions about 
Education
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
374
 questions about 
Logic
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
70
 questions about 
Truth
23
 questions about 
History

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.