Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

36
 questions about 
Literature
284
 questions about 
Mind
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
151
 questions about 
Existence
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Punishment
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music
124
 questions about 
Profession
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Culture
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Abortion
105
 questions about 
Art
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.