Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

287
 questions about 
Language
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
32
 questions about 
Sport
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
105
 questions about 
Art
208
 questions about 
Science
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
81
 questions about 
Identity
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
89
 questions about 
Law
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.