Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
374
 questions about 
Logic
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
54
 questions about 
Medicine
154
 questions about 
Sex
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Animals
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Beauty
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
244
 questions about 
Justice
51
 questions about 
War
4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.