Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Beauty
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
39
 questions about 
Race
96
 questions about 
Time
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
124
 questions about 
Profession
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
27
 questions about 
Gender
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
105
 questions about 
Art
4
 questions about 
Economics
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
208
 questions about 
Science
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
32
 questions about 
Sport
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.