Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Perception
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Biology
110
 questions about 
Animals
392
 questions about 
Religion
134
 questions about 
Love
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
32
 questions about 
Sport
69
 questions about 
Business
154
 questions about 
Sex
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
31
 questions about 
Space
51
 questions about 
War
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Culture
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
287
 questions about 
Language
284
 questions about 
Mind

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.