Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

284
 questions about 
Mind
392
 questions about 
Religion
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
154
 questions about 
Sex
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.