Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

392
 questions about 
Religion
69
 questions about 
Business
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
27
 questions about 
Gender
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
208
 questions about 
Science
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
284
 questions about 
Mind
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
70
 questions about 
Truth

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.