Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Punishment
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
23
 questions about 
History
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
68
 questions about 
Happiness
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.