Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
67
 questions about 
Feminism
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Animals
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Punishment
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
374
 questions about 
Logic
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Action
34
 questions about 
Music
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
134
 questions about 
Love
218
 questions about 
Education
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
68
 questions about 
Happiness
117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
69
 questions about 
Business
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.