Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Beauty
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
67
 questions about 
Feminism
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
70
 questions about 
Truth
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education
134
 questions about 
Love
51
 questions about 
War
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
151
 questions about 
Existence
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.