Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

58
 questions about 
Abortion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
392
 questions about 
Religion
374
 questions about 
Logic
80
 questions about 
Death
287
 questions about 
Language
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
24
 questions about 
Suicide
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
23
 questions about 
History
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Action
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.