Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
151
 questions about 
Existence
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
218
 questions about 
Education
88
 questions about 
Physics
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Animals
43
 questions about 
Color
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Culture
34
 questions about 
Music
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
154
 questions about 
Sex
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Beauty
36
 questions about 
Literature
39
 questions about 
Race
170
 questions about 
Freedom
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Perception
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.