Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
218
 questions about 
Education
117
 questions about 
Children
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
4
 questions about 
Economics
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
221
 questions about 
Value
81
 questions about 
Identity
244
 questions about 
Justice
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
23
 questions about 
History
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
43
 questions about 
Color
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
88
 questions about 
Physics
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Perception
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.