Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
51
 questions about 
War
287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Beauty
69
 questions about 
Business
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
124
 questions about 
Profession
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
4
 questions about 
Economics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
77
 questions about 
Emotion
374
 questions about 
Logic
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
36
 questions about 
Literature
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
151
 questions about 
Existence
170
 questions about 
Freedom
68
 questions about 
Happiness
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.