Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
170
 questions about 
Freedom
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
67
 questions about 
Feminism
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
89
 questions about 
Law
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
69
 questions about 
Business
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
208
 questions about 
Science
374
 questions about 
Logic
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
51
 questions about 
War
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
392
 questions about 
Religion
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
70
 questions about 
Truth
23
 questions about 
History
4
 questions about 
Economics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.