Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Punishment
244
 questions about 
Justice
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
170
 questions about 
Freedom
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Action
77
 questions about 
Emotion
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.