Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Punishment
221
 questions about 
Value
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
88
 questions about 
Physics
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
208
 questions about 
Science
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.