Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Action
43
 questions about 
Color
68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
4
 questions about 
Economics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Biology
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
170
 questions about 
Freedom
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
124
 questions about 
Profession
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
208
 questions about 
Science
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.