Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Action
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Animals
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
69
 questions about 
Business
208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Punishment
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.