Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
105
 questions about 
Art
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Biology
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
154
 questions about 
Sex
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
69
 questions about 
Business
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
80
 questions about 
Death
81
 questions about 
Identity
124
 questions about 
Profession
151
 questions about 
Existence
23
 questions about 
History
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
88
 questions about 
Physics
96
 questions about 
Time
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
36
 questions about 
Literature
392
 questions about 
Religion
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.