Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Abortion
88
 questions about 
Physics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
134
 questions about 
Love
244
 questions about 
Justice
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
117
 questions about 
Children
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Action
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
218
 questions about 
Education
221
 questions about 
Value
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
81
 questions about 
Identity
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Beauty
154
 questions about 
Sex
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.