Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

58
 questions about 
Punishment
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Culture
77
 questions about 
Emotion
244
 questions about 
Justice
284
 questions about 
Mind
221
 questions about 
Value
36
 questions about 
Literature
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Perception
39
 questions about 
Race
170
 questions about 
Freedom
69
 questions about 
Business
88
 questions about 
Physics
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
218
 questions about 
Education
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
34
 questions about 
Music
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
81
 questions about 
Identity
117
 questions about 
Children
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
23
 questions about 
History
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Animals

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.