Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
392
 questions about 
Religion
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
23
 questions about 
History
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
77
 questions about 
Emotion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
54
 questions about 
Medicine
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Beauty

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.