Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
244
 questions about 
Justice
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Action
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
392
 questions about 
Religion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
4
 questions about 
Economics
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History
89
 questions about 
Law
105
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.