Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

81
 questions about 
Identity
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Animals
134
 questions about 
Love
34
 questions about 
Music
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
4
 questions about 
Economics
287
 questions about 
Language
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Beauty
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
68
 questions about 
Happiness
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
24
 questions about 
Suicide
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
43
 questions about 
Color
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
58
 questions about 
Abortion
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.